I wasn’t convinced that charging for images was a good idea, when Electronics Talk and the other Pro-Talk sites redesigned. Agencies have now been asked to complete a survey from Pro-Talk to fine a fair price for publishing images, videos and slide shows. Although I’d be the first to say that media owners have to make a profit, I am really not sure that Pro-Talk is taking the right approach. The undoubted success of sites like Electronics Talk has primarily been driven by two factors: SEO and email [newsletters]. Unless paying the fixed monthly charge includes a package to drive additional traffic, I’m not convinced that companies will see a significant benefit in posting images and videos. This doesn’t mean I can see no value in paying for online videos or slide shows. If videos were charged on a pay-per-view basis, incentivising the website to drive relevant traffic, the situation would be very different. Sadly I suspect this isn’t going to happen in the near future.

Author

  • Mike Maynard

    In 2001 Mike acquired Napier with Suzy Kenyon. Since that time he has directed major PR and marketing programmes for a wide range of technology clients. He is actively involved in developing the PR and marketing industries, and is Chair of the PRCA B2B Group, and lectures in PR at Southampton Solent University. Mike offers a unique blend of technical and marketing expertise, and was awarded a Masters Degree in Electronic and Electrical Engineering from the University of Surrey and an MBA from Kingston University.

    View all posts