embedded world 2022 Postponed till June

Organizers of embedded world have announced that the show will be postponed to June, to allow exhibitors and participants to plan with confidence, due to recent uncertainty regarding the COVID-19 pandemic.

Now taking place from 21st-23rd June 2022, the trade fair will hold both the conference and exhibition in parallel, with key topics including the current state of research and development, open-source solutions and secure connectivity. The trade fair will also address themes of current interest, such as RISC-V and solutions to problems where chip shortages are evident.

Benedikt Weyerer, Executive Director at embedded world, commented "By deciding at an early stage to defer embedded world 2022 until summer, we are meeting the wishes of many exhibitors and enabling them to plan with confidence. We are very grateful for the many constructive conversations with industry representatives, which provided significant encouragement for this decision. Together with the exhibitors, we are looking forward to seeing the international embedded community again in Nuremberg from 21st to 23rd June."

The 2022 event will also feature a digital offering, providing global visitors with digital components of the trade fair via the talque platform. This will include showcasing new products and innovations, as well as product presentations and lectures on various topics and application examples.

Although a digital element is available for the 2022 event, it seems that the focus is on ensuring that embedded world can return safely and securely in a face to face format. With the decision made to postpone to accommodate industry expectations, it's clear to see that both exhibitors and participants support this decision to ensure an even more successful trade fair in 2022.

Here at Napier, we are delighted to see the return of embedded world as a face to face event and look forward to attending the show later on this year.



A Napier Podcast: Interview with Chris Willis - Acrolinx

In this podcast episode, we interview  Chris Willis, Chief Marketing Officer at Acrolinx, an AI-powered software that improves the quality and effectiveness of enterprise content.

Chris shares his journey to joining Acrolinx, his top tips for content generation, and how the platform helps increase the alignment and consistency of content for an organization.

Listen to the podcast now via the links below:

Transcript: Interview with Chris Willis - Acrolinx

Speakers: Mike Maynard, Chris Willis

Mike: Thanks for listening to marketing b2b Tech, the podcast from Napier, where you can find out what really works in b2b marketing today. Welcome to marketing b2b technology, the podcast from Napier. Today, I've got Chris Willis, who's the CMO for Acrolinx. Hi, Chris. Welcome to the podcast.

Chris: I'm Mike. Thanks for having me. I'm excited to be here.

Mike: So Chris, you've done some interesting things in your career. Can you talk about, you know, what you've done and how you've ended up at Acrolinx?

Chris: Sure. I think, you know, interestingly, I started my journey in technology, in web development. So not so much the traditional marketing track, started with light coding moved into some Java user interface experience. And that moved me to Europe, I ended up living in the Netherlands. And while I was there working for KPMG, I shifted to an account manager role. Because that's what people that develop front off user interface experiences often do is I'm going to go and sell in Europe. And when I moved back back to the US, I've got some light development, I've got some sales, moved into product management. And then one day at a company, I was at the room spun. And my corner of the room was marketing. And I was attracted to that. Because from a creative background, it allowed me to do interesting things to drive real world results, quickly learned that measurement is super important, the only way that you're going to get budget from anybody is if you can prove value. So became very data driven. And since then, have been the CMO at four different companies. And in addition to that, just because it's fun dimension, I'm also a crossfit coach. So lots of interesting things going on.

Mike: Yeah, I saw that. And I realised that actually, I'm a little out of shape. So maybe I'll talk to you about training afterwards. Perfect. So I mean, Acrolinx isn't necessarily one of the best known marketing tools, can you just briefly explain what it does.

Chris: So we're AI powered software that improves the quality and effectiveness of enterprise content. And what I mean by that is, it captures a business's writing guidelines, whether it's an entire organisation, or a department, or even a team catches those guidelines, the way they want to write content, and make sure that everybody that writes content aligns with those guidelines. So think, quality, brand compliance guidelines, so it can be correctness, that it's written correctly. It's the right grammar, the right spelling, but it can be consistency, it can be scannability. from a brand standpoint, tone of voice, the way that you want to communicate the level of liveliness or formality to your content, the clarity levels of of your content, who are you writing for? What level of education does that reader have? And can you write to that clarity level, in addition to things you would expect, like brand terms and brand language, and then from a compliance standpoint, things we don't say, you know, depreciated terms, inclusive language, legal terms, and being able to in a first draft guide writers to write that way. It is essentially increasing the alignment, and singularity of the voice of the content for an organisation.

Mike: So I guess, as marketers, one of the first things we worry about when we hear about these kinds of systems that control what's written is, you know, is it restrictive and Acrolinx grew out of R&D in Germany, which perhaps is not best known for its freedom in terms of writing. You know, so why did it come from Germany? And does it really restrict what people can do when they're writing?

Chris: Okay, two questions. So why did come from Germany, British founder living in Switzerland, doing his PhD programme in Germany, working with a DFK AI, which is Artificial Intelligence Lab. That's why it came out of Germany. But the other reason is, because the genesis of this business really is working with large European product manufacturers around aligning consistency across their technical documentation and product manuals. So think in terms of, you know, on a product manual, you might talk about how to connect a battery on page one, page 36, page 372, and elsewhere. And can we be consistent about how we talk about connecting a battery? So it made sense that this was started and lives headquartered in Germany, based on the need for that kind of governance inside manufacturing businesses. As to the second part of the question. We don't make decisions for writers So the guidelines are there, and we provide them. Let me give you an example. In my last business, we were a testing company, we were a mobile software testing company who sold to DevOps. Because we sold the DevOps, we didn't want to use the word test. We weren't used to word quality. DevOps folks don't see themselves, developers don't see themselves as QA testers, they're building quality software.

Now, I can't even tell you what we did without using the word test. When writers in my organisation would create content, undoubtedly, they would use the word test all over that content. What we do, what agrilinks will do is go in and say You said test, did you mean to because what we generally say is quality. And it's now up to the writer to say, but actually, in this case, I did mean test. Or, you're right, this is customer facing content, where I'm talking about an idea of quality, I'll shift this to quality, we have the ability to do that change autumn, automatically, we can automate that process. But because of the creative aspect of writing, we can't always know what you meant, what the context is. So we can guide you to align, we can guide you to be better, we can guide you to be within those guidelines. But we don't want to take those draconian measures of just changing it for you, because that could dramatically change what you mentioned. Right?

Mike: That's interesting. So I mean, Acrolinx is actually if you like working with the writer of the writer produces their content, rather than checking finished pieces.

Chris: It can do both. So there is a sidebar that runs within any authoring environment. So you could open up Word and have your sidebar, obviously, Google doc sidebar, but Adobe products, Madcap flare wherever you're creating your content inside CMS systems, for instance. And so as you write, you can check your content, and it comes back and says, Hey, this is really hard to read. Here's some reasons why. And what you get is essentially a scorecard. And that scorecard will take you through your quality flags. This is written incorrectly from a consistency standpoint, this isn't working for us clarity level, you this unclear hard to read of your off tone of voice, please use these words, don't use these words, and you end up with a score. And that score represents your global alignment to that piece of content. You're also getting each piece of guidance and saying these are the changes you need to make. So you can write, write, write, check, go back and make changes and see your score improve. We also have companies that use the product completely automated. So write write, write, write, write check in to a repository, and let's say overnight, that content is checked by accurate links, and a scorecard is delivered alongside it.

Mike: So effectively, you know, Acrolinx, is understanding the content, I guess that's the AI bit and checking against certain rules or requirements. And how much effort is involved in setting up the rules as to what constitutes a particular companies style.

Chris: So there's, there's a couple different ways that we manage that capture process. One is a company knows it. So the way that I think about it is that every owner of content, whether it's at the enterprise level, or in the silo, whether it's in tech docs, or marketing, or wherever, everybody has a whiteboard, and that whiteboard has everything that they think they want to write about the way that they want to communicate their quality, brand compliance, all detailed up there. And the problem is, it's on a whiteboard in their office, so nobody can see it. And if they could see it, we don't really have writers anymore, we have people that come to work, and a byproduct of us coming to work is the creation of content. So we don't all follow that we're just trying to get things down on paper to be done with something and move on to the next thing. And so what we do, what the product does, is it just consumes all that right off the whiteboard, if you know that will pull all that information into Acrolinx and set up guidelines based on that.

Now, not everybody knows those guidelines, right? So another way that we can manage that is to take what you think is objectively good content, like what what's working for you what what represents you the way that you want to, and we can read that content, and then pull out guidelines from it. And then it becomes a discussion of Do you agree that this is the content that you want? And what you end up with? Is this set of guidelines? What's a guideline? Good question, Mike, I'll tell you, the easiest one to understand, is top level, we're all gonna spell the name of the company, right? What if we could do that? Like, what would that save us? If we worked at a complex company that sometimes uses you know, one word sometimes these American Express are my AmEx and my American Express and my aes or.com involved in this? Do we always use the same do we say American Express the first time MX after that, how do we manage that? And so first rule, we all say the name of the company, right? Done. Fantastic. And if you understand that guideline, everything flows down from there, then it's, you know, we say this, we don't say this, we want this level of clarity. We want this tone of voice, and how do we create a tone of voice? If our tone of voice is I want to be witty, but wise and not arrogant? How do I turn that into actionable guidelines. So if I want to be conversational, I want shorter sentences. I don't want to do big long run ons, I don't want marketing language, I don't want buzzwords, I want to use you and yours. So that I connect with the audience. And that all becomes the rules that people are essentially using to develop their software, their their content.

Mike: The SAS, I think it sounds like, I mean, you're almost creating a style guide for a company, would you ever see companies who bring their style guide, you then run the tool? And that the company goes, Oh, we should have had that in the style guide, or we should have added that?

Chris: Yep. And most all of our customers do have a style guide they use and they can actually import that into the platform. Or they can build alongside that.

Mike: So the obvious question is, if you've got a style guide, why doesn't that work? Why doesn't that ensure consistency?

Chris: Well, back to the statement I just made, most of our writers aren't writers, they're people like you and I that come to work and know something, we're subject matter expert for something in our business. And most people have never seen their company style guidelines. So it's a matter of first getting that out in front of people, then getting people to comply to that, to learn it, to know it and to live it. And when we had dedicated Writing teams, that was a thing. But as that starts to go further and further from where we live, putting that in front of people in a systematic way becomes necessary if we're going to get that alignment. You also have a case where a lot of people are, you know, out in the world building their own voice. And you know, I work at a huge company, but I write for their blog. It sounds like me, it doesn't sound like them. And how do I align with this global business? You need that that level of assistance of high level governance to sound like the business not sound like you think about it in terms of I mean, you've used a chat bot. And that's the most obvious example of live communication with a with a global brand. If you're having a conversation with somebody through chat on a on a website, and you're trying to solve a healthcare problem, for instance, or an insurance problem, do you want somebody to communicate like them? Or do you want them to communicate like the business? You want it like the business because everybody's different, and they can offend the heck out of you without even meaning to just by adding an extra smiley face emoji? Like it's just how they communicate, but it's not how the business communicates?

Mike: That's, that's fascinating. I mean, that, you know, that there's two things there. One is the change in how we generate content. And it sounds like what you're saying, I think this reflects, what I'm seeing is that we're moving away from dedicated Writing teams, and we're having to pull in a lot more people to do writing is that what you're seeing is that the challenge, there's a lot more people generating content that is then used outside the business?

Chris: Absolutely. So it's interesting, we learned, we learned something, I guess, a year and a half ago that we didn't really see coming. So part of where we were in the iteration of us as a company was talking to our customers about value and reduction in the cost of content creation. And so you know, make the statement, I can save you X number of dollars in your content budget. And here's what we didn't expect. The response was, that sounds really great. Show me where in my budget, I have content creation money. Now, a lot of our customers have agency money, you're they're creating money out, or they're creating content outside. And that's more easy to identify. But the kind of being created inside the business isn't necessarily budget driven. It's things that you do as a as an employee. So an example from my life is in my last company, my best writer, was somebody that worked in product marketing, and in that business, Product Marketing didn't report to me. So I'm borrowing somebody else's resources to be able to create this amazing content, but that content was being written in English as a second language. So grammatically, difficult to read, clarity, difficult to read. And the editorial process was very difficult because I can't just fix it, right? Because if I fix it, and I don't really understand the technology behind it, I'm be changed in the context.

So there's back and forth between this person that wrote this content. And our editing team took forever. Because we change it changes it back. It's not what I meant, you're changing what I meant, you're changing my words. And so this, this was a huge and difficult and daunting problem. And what made it worse was we were in the process of writing a book, there's 26 chapters in the book, 20 of them were written by different individuals, all non writers writing in English as a second language, like, Oh, my, how do you manage that. And that was actually what that was, right? Where I was sitting when I discovered the business that I now work at. And this just seemed like such a, such an answer to the problem that I had of these great minds, fantastic. Technologists, who just couldn't get it down on paper in a way that made sense and that was readable. But if I could give them that guidance, real time in their first draft, it's gonna save me months and 10s of 1000s of dollars I get, it's a real value to the business. It didn't look like I was spending a lot of money, because I don't have a budget for content, but I was in every other area to be able to cover this.

Mike: I totally agree. I think, you know, think about a lot of our clients, you know, the last thing you want to do is save them well, we're here to save you money on content generation, because most of our clients would say, actually, if I could double my content output, I could double the budget it absolutely, it's much more about making it easier to generate content. And I think that's, that's a really interesting point that agrilinks is actually making it easier for people to create content, if they're not somebody who's necessarily been trained as a writer.

Chris: Well, if you think about the process of creating content in an organisation, so there's a, there's a content team, and they're tasked with solving the problem, I need this document. Cool, they're not going to create it, they're going to go to a subject matter expert elsewhere in the business, they're going to request that that content be created. And then they have an editing team, most likely, internal editing, team, external editing teams are expensive. So that person writes it, it goes to the editor. And then there's that back and forth that we just talked about. And finally, it's at a point where it works. And it makes it to the stakeholder, some management level person who looks at it and says, Oh, this is I get it, I see what you're trying to do here, this is really cool. But I have this other idea. If you could go make these changes, and boom, we're back to the writer into the subject matter expert. And now we're back in that feedback loop again, and finally gets back to the stakeholder again, they're like, Okay, this seems good. But did you have you? Have you talked to legal about this, because most of our customers are very large organisations who need to go through compliance and regulatory checks. So now it makes to legal and they're like, What the heck happened here, they're not allowed to say any of this. So all it goes back to the writer, again, who has to make the changes that are aligned with legal that back to editorial.

And so the simple request that I had from the content team, just took between four and six weeks to come to completion. And the problem with that is, I needed it four to six weeks ago, I don't need it anymore. So all this work that we just did, was essentially for nothing, because I have a piece of content, which now is great. But I don't time sensitive, I don't need it anymore. And I mean, this is a story that's been validated and validated and validated with companies that we've talked to, is that we're losing 50% or more of the work that we're doing around content creation, because it's not needed by the time it's delivered. So if I can shrink the time it takes to get that content from ideation to production, it's more likely that I'm getting more content out, I'm reducing the amount of content I'm throwing on the floor. And I'm reducing the amount of time that people are touching this, we're reducing all that and that manual work gets really more mechanical, and letting people do the things that they should be doing. So if I can reduce all of that middle of the middle of the process, labour, all those folks that were spending all that time can do more creation work. And that's where we get that loop back to more content, because everybody wants more and nobody's being given more budget. So I need more, I need more content from you, you don't get more people, you don't get more budget, I just need more and how do you how do you do that you got to fix all of your supply chain problems all the way through this process. And that's one of the things that we do.

Mike: That's fascinating. And I think you know, there's so many people listening to this that would relate to the making it easier to generate content in particular making it easier to generate content that gets through those internal filters, those people who've got to approve it. You know, that can be the toughest job sometimes.

Chris: Yeah, I mean if your organisation uses something like Aqua links, and it ties it in with legal for example, and legal has prebuilt content guidelines that you need to go through in the writing process, think about how much it costs to go through legal review in a global enterprise. If I can reduce that by any percentage, any percentage, that's a measurable amount of budget, and time. And so that's, that's where we're seeing these real gains for these organisations that and if we move into the development side and look at, for instance, tech docs, we've gotten so much better at building software over the course of the last several decades going from waterfall approach to Agile to continuous integration to continuous delivery. But one thing hasn't changed, it still takes the same amount of time to create the documentation and go through the editorial process. So something has to give. And what's been giving for a lot of companies is the review process they're covering with a small team of tech bloggers, they're able to cover one to 2% of the content that's coming out alongside their software, which means one of two things, and I'll let the audience draw their conclusions. One, they're only releasing one to 2% of their technical documentation, or 290 8% of their talking, their technical documentation is going out without any real review. So that's a problem.

And how do you solve that, when you can't solve it with people? You can't throw people at that problem? Because you mean, I have four people getting 2%? How many would I need 100%. That's a army, what you have to do is build automation in that process. And when you build that automation in, you're able to check 90 100% of that content, and see actual quantified scores that say, this is why this is okay. So maybe an 80 out of 100 means that it's good to move to the next stage, it passes a gate, and maybe in 90 means it's good to move to production. And you have that, that kind of chain of custody of that content, knowing that it's gone through those types of rigorous checks, even if there aren't people involved. And that's where, you know, again, people are seeing acceleration happen, they're able to create at the speed of the business, as the business speeds up, I can do more with less, and then use the savings in all those people that I had to let those people do creative jobs, not stupid manual jobs.

Mike: And that's such a good point. Because, you know, you hear a lot about companies investing in, you know, building more technology, you just don't hear people about putting the same amount of investment into tech docs, which which is important. That's why we end up with documentation that sucks.

Chris: Well, and the whole, the whole thing that's happened in the last couple of years, for a decade up and talking about the digital shift, and using that as a thing to drive people to action, it's coming someday your only point of contact is going to be through the internet, and you need to be ready for that nobody really thought that was going to happen. But it did. And here we are, we've moved to a world where the customer experience the way that we think about it as businesses has changed dramatically. Because now it's not just your customers experience is always kind of been synonymous with front office connection with your consumer. It's the the website where they buy their product. But now you really need to be thinking about it in terms of its in the product you sell. It's the words on your product or in your product. If you're a software business, it's your user. It's your your UI strengthens. It's in your documentation around your product, your product manuals, it moves into the education, internal and enablement. It's your marketing materials, it's your sales content, and then out into service and support and all the post sales content that you're going to create. If these are the things that I interact with my consumer around, I need a certain level of structure of governance over that whole process.

And we're not set up that way as businesses today. Everybody's still a silo. You have your your technical documentation team, your manuals, teams, your marketing teams, your education, educational content teams, and then your service teams, your service and score teams. What we see happening, what I believe will happen more and more over the next several years is that that customer experience, total Global Customer Experience will roll into a leadership role at the sea level in the business to oversee the experience that you have with the company not with the pieces company. If a company is a person, you hear Google talk all the time about we want to we want to communicate like a person where there is a outreach of Google as a person to you, a person in the audience a consumer. You got to think about that across every touchpoint not just the obvious ones. And that's where this starts to get really interesting.

Mike: Absolutely. And I guess I mean that that brings me to an interesting term on your website, which is goal driven content, people are often producing content to achieve certain things. Can you explain exactly what you mean by goal driven content? And how accurate links will help people be more successful at achieving those goals?

Chris: Sure. So good content is great. But is it good for the cause? So I think in terms of the concept of content, fitness, is it fit for purpose? So it's good, but it's not right for what I'm doing with it. So I, I wrote a really great essay, and a fantastic landing page about apple orchards. And I put it on the National Milk Board's website. It's great. But I'm going to do anything. It's not fit for purpose, it's in the wrong place. So our idea of content fitness speaks to, you know, upfront, what problems Am I trying to solve? So if it's a conversion thing, if I'm trying to convert more leads, I'm trying to convert more sales. The purpose of this is to engage and educate and move into a sales cadence? Do I have content that does that today? So can agrilinks help you look across your entire content lexicon and find a piece of content that solves the problem that you're trying to solve? If not, can we help you to build that content? So go beyond, you know, the quality, correctness and character that we talk about? And think about? How do you build content that's going to be found and usable for this purpose. And then once I've identified what that content supposed to look like, now, I'm going to build it, leveraging in brand language and the clarity levels in the voice that our audience cares about. But that last piece is relevance, will identify that this piece of content is relevant to the cause. And your score isn't going to just be this content is good. Your score is this content is fit for what you're trying to solve.

I'm trying to sell something right here, this piece of content is designed to be found for that purpose, designed to help users convert, and then is relevant to the problem I'm trying to solve and the product I'm trying to sell. And all of that comes together to have a much higher level of score than what we've delivered. In past years, this fitness score gets it the fact that this content will deliver. Now, the next question you would ask is what if it doesn't? Mike? Great question. Thanks for asking. If it doesn't, it starts to play towards some of the assumptions that you made in the creation of the model. So 80% of Gartner asked a group of CMOS? Do you build your own guidelines, and almost all of them said, Yes, they'd come up with their own set of guidelines. And 80% of them identified that they made them up. They don't I mean, it's my job, I'm supposed to be good at that. And I think I am, but I might be wrong. And so if I made them up, and I create content, and it comes out, and it's perfect, it's fit for purpose. It's findable, it's readable, it's going to do all the things that I think it's going to, really, that's based on a model that I created. If it doesn't perform, when it comes out the other end, what I'm learning there is that I need to iterate my process, I need to go back into my guidelines, and look at where my assumptions were incorrect. And that's a huge focus of moving from strategy aligned content creation, which is defining your guidelines, and building to those guidelines, to audience alignment, where I listen to the audience and their reaction to my content. And I use that to iterate and get closer to them. And that's sort of a vision in the future right now. But as businesses get closer to that audience alignment, they're creating that engagement content that's going to drive and really drive the business forward. That's where we're very much focused right now this whole concept of content fitness, will culminate in a brand new product for us being launched in January. That is delivering that full content fitness experience.

Mike: I feel I should ask you about the product. But I'm sure you're not going to tell me because it's not January yet, but that's fascinating, I guess. I guess I've got a look and see if there's any issues and the first thing a lot of people find with AI is the requirement for large training sets. So I mean, do you find that people need to producing a lot of content to make Acrolinx work effectively?

Chris: I mean, In general, this is a product that's designed for use at scale. If you only have small batches of content, it's probably not necessary to drive this level of AI. If you look at, you know, a representative customer of ours, they're doing hundreds of 1000s of content checks a month, millions a year. And that's where this evolution comes from is that use it scale. But at the same time, I use the product, where a much smaller customer or company than our customers, and I'm still getting great value out of what our product delivers. Because I, I own, you know, the central ruleset and enable to define the way that we communicate. And in doing that, learn some really interesting things even at small scale. A fun thing that I learned is that, you know, I came in to the business in 2017, our founder, and I sat down and defined the tone of voice that we wanted to move forward with. And we implemented it for our front office.

So sales, marketing, BDRs, all had access to this implementation of agrilinks. And it worked really nicely. Our audiences appreciated the tone of voice that we created, it was found to be engaging, seems like a great thing. So me, being a power hungry megalomaniac said, Cool, I want everybody to use this whole business, everybody got to do this, and pushed it out into the next best place beyond marketing, which is our support team. And when you're writing your support tickets use this implementation of agrilinks. It seems to be resonating well with our audiences. Interesting thing happened, our support audiences hated it, hated it, didn't think it was fun at all didn't want witty and wise yet not arrogant, and blah, blah, give no interest in that at all. They want their questions answered, they want it clear, consistent, concise, solve my problem. And so the idea of you bifurcating your ruleset looking at it hierarchal. So, at the top, it's we all spell the company name, right. But down from there, I may have a more lively conversational tone and one side and a more formal, consistent in, in clear tone on the other, to be able to communicate to those two different use cases. But the things that are inherited are the things that make us accompany that make us having you're having a conversation with one thing. It's just that when I'm having it over here, I don't want a lot of flowers. I just just want words, over here. You want that engagement and liveliness and somebody that sounds more like me.

Mike: That's fascinating, interesting that different audiences feel your company actually needs slightly different different tones of voice makes a lot of sense. When you say, and I'm really sorry, Chris, you know, we're running out of time here. I'd love to get your take on, you know, do you have three key things you can give us as top tips for content generation, that maybe you've learned, you know, seeing customers use agrilinks That perhaps anyone could benefit from?

Chris: I mean, I think first and foremost is know your audience demand gen teams do a really good job of knowing who they're marketing to. So you identify your persona, you create your ideal customer profile. And you're going after those, that audience, content teams need to do that same thing and really understand who they're communicating to, and how those people both consume content and want to hear content. And by tailoring that approach, you're going to create more impact, people are going to enjoy your content or engage with your content, you're going to get better business results out of that. The other thing that I think is super important, is looking beyond the obvious. I'm actually doing a speaking session at a nother conference in two weeks. And the topic is about sort of forgetting about your customer, and writing actionable content. And I mean, my provocative statement of the day is business to business content is boring, and nobody cares about it. The only people that care about your product sheets are people that already know who you are, that are looking to solve a specific problem. If you're trying to engage an audience, right, something actionable, would write something that's valuable to everybody. And so that whole theme of like thinking through creative ways to solve problems whether whether your product is perfect for that or not provides the value that expands your business and your brand well beyond your customer, your your customer base and your audience.

And that's been a way that I've launched a number of businesses over the course of my career is just by Creating content that people care about, it goes well beyond the product. The final thing is that it doesn't take software to manage governance. It's, it's great, too. But taking a more active approach towards your governance, if you think in terms of we talked before this session about style guidelines, everybody has style guidelines. But do you adhere to them? Do you? Do you push them out into non writers in your organisation? And in most cases, no, I have a sense of guidelines. But I'm not really managing that being more active around that putting those in front of people finding a way to measure content, rather than just produce it and roll it out. All of these things are software free approaches, it's just being being active about it being intentional about the way that we look at content creation, versus I got to get this done. I got it done. He read this real quick, cool and putting it up on the website. And that sounds like a small business problem. But it's not that's an every business problem, like, boom, it's up and it's out who read this, I don't know. But it's out there. And we don't really get to check content for quality of context of the content more, we're just making sure it doesn't have obscenities in the middle of it, and then it can go up. And that shouldn't be that way.

Mike: I think it's brilliant advice. I love the way that, you know, certainly at a small scale, a lot of this doesn't need any automation. You know, it just needs people thinking about it. You know, and certainly I think when you get to scale, it's very clear why a product like Acrolinx you know, comes into its own is massively beneficial for for everyone, both the content creators and the people reviewing it. Yeah. I really appreciate your time. Chris has been fascinating. I've got about 20 Other questions I could have asked you. But if anybody does have anything like to ask you, or they want to find out more about Acrolinx and what would be the best way to get in contact with you.

Chris: You can always find me at Chris@acrolinx.com and I am on LinkedIn at CP Willis.

Mike: Perfect. So hopefully we'll have lots more people contacting you because it's going to benefit everyone because the content on the web is going to be so much better. I really appreciate your time. Thanks again for for being on the podcast, Chris.

Chris: Thanks for having me. I enjoyed it.

Mike: Thanks so much for listening to marketing b2b Tech. We hope you enjoyed the episode. And if you did, please make sure you subscribe on iTunes, or on your favourite podcast application. If you'd like to know more, please visit our website at Napier b2b dot com or contact m

Influential Entrepreneurs Podcast Interview

Mike Maynard, Managing Director at Napier recently sat down with Mike Saunders, host of The Influential Entrepreneurs. In this episode, Mike discusses goal-driven marketing, and why it's so important for successful campaigns.

Listen to the full interview here, or via your favourite podcast app, and don’t hesitate to get in touch and let us know your thoughts.

A Mixed Outlook on the Future of Trade Shows

With SPS cancelled with just a week's notice before it was meant to go ahead, it's been a stark reminder that the COVID-19 pandemic is still a threat to trade shows. With increasing infection rates in Germany resulting in tighter restrictions for events, the show had no choice but to cancel due to the new limitations put in place.

But up until this point, SPS was predicted to go ahead successfully. Events such as productronica were able to go ahead in mid-November and did see around 20,000 visitors from nearly 70 countries, which were required to either be recovered from a COVID-19 infection, be vaccinated or have a negative PCR test result.  Although the number of visitors was about half from the heady days of the mid 2010s, this has shown that there is definitely still life in shows, and people are prepared to travel to them. In fact, the number of visitors was much higher than expected by the productronica events team, and visitors travelled from across Europe, with the top 10 visitor countries including Italy, France, Austria, Switzerland, Great Britain and the Netherlands.

With the outcome of productronica presenting the viewpoint that there 'is no alternative to personal contact', trade shows are making a valiant effort to ensure face to face conversations between exhibitors and visitors can go ahead once more. But with COVID rates going up for winter, there is still a huge risk around attending events, particularly as European governments introduce lockdowns as the infection rates go up. Only time will tell whether trade shows can return to their full strength once more, and we know many in the industry will be looking forward to this day.

A Napier Podcast: Interview with Kate Terry - Turtl

In this podcast episode, we interview Kate Terry, Head of Demand at Turtl, a content automation platform.

Kate shares why she thinks content is essentially communication, and why Turtl is persuading marketers to move away from webpages and PDFs. She discusses how the platform encourages an interactive and personalized approach, and how Turtl provides data that marketers can use to optimise content.

Listen to the podcast now via the links below:

Transcript: Interview with Kate Terry - Turtl

Mike: Thanks for listening to marketing b2b Tech, the podcast from Napier, where you can find out what really works in b2b marketing today. Welcome to marketing b2b technology, the podcast from Napier. Today I'm talking with Kate Terry, who's head of demand at Turtle. Welcome to the podcast, Kate.

Kate: Hi, Mike, thanks so much for having me. And great to be here.

Mike: Awesome. So I'm really interested, you've ended up at Turtle, but how did you get there? Can you talk us through your career and what you've done?

Kate: Definitely. So I have done marketing in quite a few different industries, and actually in quite a few places around the world as well. I started out doing marketing for a law firm in Austin, Texas moved into actually a life science consultancy in Denmark alongside a master's programme, where I was studying cognition and communication. So the way we communicate and think and how we interact with technology. And then after that, I actually went to into marketing and higher education in London for a little bit, I was quite interested in the research and goal and kind of continuing on in that. But I wanted to get into technology marketing, in particular. And actually, I came across the perfect company, because it pulled together my interest in psychology, my interest in kind of understanding the way we think and communicate, and then my desire to kind of be in a really fast paced business working with really innovative products. So that was when I moved over to turtle. And, you know, as I said, It originally stood out to me, because the technology is built around psychology, it's an innovative product, it looks to kind of really improve the experience for those of us who are both making and reading business content. So I'd say it's something that we can hopefully all benefit from one day. And, you know, I think at the core of it content is essentially just communication, it's kind of the glue of business, and especially in a remote first environments. It's the way that we're all kind of sharing our knowledge, sharing our expertise, sharing the solutions that we have, and kind of getting getting through to the people we want to reach and communicate with. So it's it's really essential. And I think having a different approach to it and understanding kind of engagement, understanding psychology, understanding what really works, you know, we're kind of approaching it with different ways to democratize content across the organisation. So it's just a really exciting mission to be part of and, you know, kind of ties into my background in a really interesting way that makes me excited to work.

Mike: It's interesting, because you're trying to persuade us marketers to move away from web pages and PDFs.

Kate: Yes, yes, that's right. The PDF is a classic and known enemy of turtle, we, you know, there, there are quite a few challenges, I think, with PDF that, you know, we can probably get into. But at its core, it's just a legacy format that isn't, and was never really designed to be a real time easy to optimise easy to engage with digital format, it was designed to replace print and to kind of be something that fit in with that idea of like the print cycle of production, where you would go to press and get it out there. And then it's there. And just That's it, you know, so I think what we see in so many domains is that online, we act in a much more on demand and responsive way, we need to engage with content in that way. And the PDF just hasn't really caught up. Not to mention, it's just likes engagement. You know, I'll get into it a little bit later. But we've got some interesting stats about how, how much engagement you actually lose when you send out content in a PDF.

Mike: That's interesting. I mean, I guess one of the first things, you know, somebody cynical, might say, as well, people are running content marketing campaigns, and they're running them to generate leads. So doesn't everything really start and end with the title and getting that lead? Does it really matter whether people engage with the content because your sales team can follow up?

Kate: Yeah, I mean, I think that's a great question. And it kind of goes to the core of what are we trying to accomplish with content with content that we're sending out? You know, is it that we just want to get the names and emails of people who we think are interested in it? Or is it that we really want to know who is properly engaged, who is kind of, you know, using and, like, found our content useful, actually spent time with it actually kind of took some value from it? And yeah, I think that there's kind of, there's a place for lead gen where you are looking more at a surface level to say, well, who's interested in this at all, but it comes down to also being able to prioritise those leads and say, Well, you know, are they really that qualified? If we have no idea what happened to them after they kind of initially downloaded that content? We don't really know anything about The timing or how to follow up with them, or, you know, the priority that we should give them if we don't have any additional kind of data on their actual engagement. So it just gives us kind of a higher quality, spin, I guess, to lead gen if you think about adding that on as a piece of intelligence. But more generally, I do think it's important to assess the value of content and say, Well, what is really the value of this content we're sending out, we really want people to read it. And that should be kind of the end goal. And if it's not the end goal, it's kind of, you know, content being utilised in different ways. But I would say there are other ways to do that, that aren't necessarily creating a nice and really compelling piece of content.

Mike: So I love the fact that you're talking about benefits, both for the reader in terms of more compelling content, but also for the marketer in terms of more data. So can you just unpack a little bit about, you know, what kind of data you can give marketers? And how they can use that to understand whether someone is a hot lead? Or maybe not quite such good luck?

Kate: Yeah, definitely. So I think the big difference is that it's data after the that first kind of, you know, download, what you can see with a PDF is typically that someone downloaded the content. And that's kind of where the journey ends, a lot of the time, it's just like a straight up piece of static content. So what we want to provide as an alternative is data about how long people read for the different sections of the content that they actually read and engaged with versus those that they didn't, and, you know, specific returns for each of those, we want to be able to link that to companies and individuals as much as possible. So we want to be able to see exactly who did that and what their individual level of engagement was. And I think crucially, we want to be able to pull all of those insights into our CRM in real time. And that's what a lot of I mean, I'm in demand gen. So that's kind of the gold standard, for me is real time engagement data that automatically gets synced into my CRM gets mapped against my lead scoring and can help to prioritise that without me ever needing to take a look at it. So ultimately, that integrated piece is really important. And that's kind of where a content automation platform can come in, as is giving you all of that data against your own contacts and accounts, and then being able to sync that in real time. And yeah, I think for the people creating the content as well, just being able to actually take a look at how the content is performing, which sections of it work well, which sections of it don't, being able to, you know, move things around or change things up as needed to test is super valuable, and not really something that content marketers have had access to until now. So just being able to optimise your content against the actual ways that people are engaging with it is really, really valuable.

Mike: That's fascinating. I've got to ask this. Do you find some marketers pushback? Because they actually don't want to know which bit of content isn't working?

Kate: Yeah, I do think there is a lot of that mindset of just, you almost Yeah, you don't don't necessarily want to know what works. And I think an interesting application of that is companies who provide content for other companies. So whether it's a syndicated piece of content or something like that, I think there's a little bit of reluctance to actually have that data, because you might find out that the content didn't work as well as you think it did. And you might have to report those results back. So there's more transparency, which can be you know, it might shine a light on something that you don't like, and I totally understand that perspective. But on the other hand, you know, you do want to know if your content isn't working. And I think it's really important. And from that maybe advertisers point of view, being able to, you know, I think people first of all are asking for it, like people want to know, is this content actually working? What's the real value here? What am I really getting out of it. So you see people moving into different types of models to try to kind of pull more value out of content. But really, if you can show them and say, Hey, listen, this got this much engagement from your core audience that's so much more valuable. And it actually does give you like, a really important data source that I think proves the value of content. So it shows you what might be wrong. But on the other hand, you've got a starting point to improve and actually start to prove the value of content as well. So I think it's maybe a tough bandaid to rip off, but an important one.

And I think proving the value is a really important point as well, you know, people can actually show that particular content has been read rather than it's just been sent. And maybe that that's a great segue to something I think you teased earlier, which is, you talked about the things you lose when you send a PDF, I mean, we're all sending PDFs at the moment, pretty much. And so, tell us what the problems are with delivering content as a PDF. Yeah.

So, um, you know, thinking back again to this idea of what we're trying to accomplish with a piece of content, ultimately, we want people to read it. We want people to understand and ideally be kind of motivated and educated by it. Right? So, um, you know, it shouldn't necessarily just be a vehicle to get an email address, it should be valuable and kind of really engaged with. So without some of those metrics, it's hard to say how effective your content actually is. But, you know, actually, there are ways to find that out because we work with an independent research agency called lumen research. And they are doing a lot of research into this challenge of attention for marketers, so they're looking at it in different ways. And they use a combination of eye tracking studies and kind of some mixed methods survey data to understand this challenge of attention. And they're kind of putting out a lot of research around, you know, how are we actually gathering attention online? And what does that mean? So they studied digital formats, and they took the PDF and turtle doc, they put the same content in both of those formats. And they ran eye tracking studies and survey data to find out like, what is the engagement, that that's kind of happening across both of these formats. And the findings were pretty startling, actually, they found out that the PDF loses out on 90%, of possible engagement when compared to the turtle dock. So just due to the fact that it's not interactive, it's not in a format designed around psychology, and it's not responsive, they were looking at mobile as well, it loses out on quite a bit of engagement. So you know, if you put that into context, every time you send out a PDF, via your kind of paid lead gen campaign, you are losing out on 90% of potential engagement. And you know, going back to the real value, if you're if you are really wanting to engage your readers there, you're missing out, I think if you send out PDFs,

Mike: Fascinating, so I love that about being responsive about it being interactive. But the other thing that turtle offices personalization, so how important is personalization, in terms of grabbing reader's attention? Yeah,

Kate: I mean, there's a lot of stats that speak to this kind of the power of personalization, I think some of the key value that I've kind of, um, you know, been most interested in and followed is this idea of increasing customer loyalty and sort of upsell opportunities. There's some stats around how it improves engagement, you know, from various companies who have their own form of personalization. So I think at a high level, it's something that marketers kind of know, and understand and recognise the need for, you know, there's this idea, even at the heart of marketing, that if you're marketing to everyone, you're marketing to no one. So personalization is effectively, you know, marketing in a lot of ways. But what we need to be able to do, of course, particularly in b2b is do that. But for so many different personas, so many different types of buyers who are all in different places, in terms of their timing, their interests, their requirements. So without personalization, and what I mean by that is sort of being able to personalise the right message for all of those different people at the right time. You know, it's very hard to market, especially in b2b. So I think it's something that is sort of a necessity for b2b marketers, in a lot of ways. So the question is, how are we going to do it? And how are we actually going to achieve this level of personalization that we know we need?

Mike: I guess that that's a great question to throw back at you is, I mean, what works in personalization, you know, you see some people doing simple things like just putting the customer's company name onto a document. And you see other people basically changing the content to try and reflect an individual's interest. And then you've got pretty much everything in between with names and things like that. I mean, what do you think works? And how much time should a marketer be investing in personalization versus generating the content originally?

Kate: Yeah, I mean, so I think of personalization as going beyond that surface level. So I do think the surface level of personalising it for that person is important, at least in terms of grabbing their attention, right. So you've got a little bit of, you know, you have some stats around how people respond to their first name, and how people kind of respond when something is made. For them specifically, there's just an extra bit of attention that they'll pay to that. So at that level, you know, even if it is just that level of personalization, I think it can kind of uplift what you're trying to do. However, I think where it really becomes more meaningful is when you have that added layer of syncing up the data and the insight you have on people with the right content to send them and you know, that can look like a lot of different things that could be the right piece of content. Or you could get a little bit more granular and say it's actually the right combination of content pulled together for them, you know, so there's different ways to do it. And I think when you think about the time to invest, you know, I always suggest starting with what you have available and trying things out seeing what works best seeing what actually moves the needle, you know, testing, whether it's testing out trying the first name and trying that out, you know that there Ways to kind of establish whether something works and then dive in a little bit further when you find out that it does work. So, you know, for us, we've run quite a few different tests on let's try it with just the first name versus not, let's try it with the right content versus not. So there's there's always different ways to kind of engage with personalization. But for me, the most meaningful level is when you combine, it's made for them, and it has the right content for them sent at the right time. Crucially, it's very much relying on your data, to give you that insight and be able to then send it off in real time that say, I really like this idea in data, and I guess in like, kind of workflow management of the next best action. So based on what they're doing, and the signal that you have, what's the next best thing you can send them and that starts when you think about like a personalised buyer journey. If you take it to the high level, you're kind of trying to build their own journey that sends them the right content at the right time, with maybe their name and a video for them on it, that's great. But the kind of heart of it is sending it at the right time with the right message.

Mike: And that's interesting, you talk about you know that the right content the right time, and obviously, turtle, I think is known for creating the right content, customising the content for each individual. How do you get the right time is that by integrating with other systems like marketing automation?

Kate: Yeah, that's exactly it. So it's it's very much about integrations and using the data that you already have to be able to deliver something very timely and relevant. Um, there's another interesting way to do it as well, though, which I think is actually delivering content that people can engage with and give you data back. So having more of a conversation and making it a little bit more collaborative, let's say you don't necessarily know what exactly they're interested in at that time, you know, you can just ask them and use, we call it public personalization. But it's basically delivering content that can be customised in real time by that reader to create exactly what they need on demand. So timing, I think can be both ways, your own data, integrating that and using, let's say, rules and workflows to determine, like, at this time, as soon as they do this, let's send them this personalised piece of content, or flipping it back and saying, like, let's send them this content, and they can determine what the best thing that they need to see right now is so making it more of an on demand experience.

Mike: I mean, I'm intrigued by this public personalization. So presumably, you're doing a lot more than just sending a PDF and hoping person goes to page 103, if that's what they're interested in. So can you just unpack a little bit about how this works, and how a reader would choose the content that's relevant to them?

Kate: Definitely. So I'll give a couple of examples. One of them is, with Amazon ads, their marketing team, and they were looking to send out content just before their busy kind of shopping season to across our customer base, they identified six different audiences with that they kind of needed different pieces of information. And they had to actually put it into nine different languages as well. So it was a pretty big kind of content challenge in front of them, where they needed, you know, really timely information, they didn't necessarily have the data to say exactly what each person would need. But they knew they had kind of six different audiences that they wanted to deliver it to. So they decided to use public personalization, to give them the kind of, you know, way to sift through that and actually find the right information very easily. So basically, that looks like setting up the content behind the scenes, in a modular way. And using a form at the top of that. So kind of an engaging user facing form where they're asked a few questions to self segment, really, they can be questions, as fun or as you know, like practical as need be really depends in Amazon's case, I think it was asking about, you know, what type of vendor they are, the type of information that they needed, you know, going into the shopping season, and then it delivers them a personalised piece of content on demand. So they've got that piece of content that has just the right information for them. It's actually localised automatically as well. So it's in their language, and, you know, something that they can hold on to bookmark save, it's their own kind of piece of content, because it's a personalised ID for them. So they've now got a fully personalised piece of content. So, you know, Amazon was able to deliver against these pretty tight timelines content to six different audiences, nine languages, and it's, you know, they seen some really impressive engagement figures from that. So I think that's basically the core of it, you know, as an example, just this idea of, you know, understanding your audience, giving them the choice, letting them fill in and kind of make their own choose your own content journey, let's say, and then you actually get that insight back as well. So that data can be fed back into their CRM. Now they know a little bit more about that segment of customers. So the next time they send a piece of content, they've got that as a reference point. Okay, last time they selected as a vendor, I'm going to keep them on this vendor track and send them the next best piece of content to follow up with.

Mike: So that public personalization is a great way to profile contacts.

Kate: Exactly. Yeah, definitely. If you don't know, like, if you kind of have the challenge of like, we've got a huge email list and we don't know is interested, giving people the chance to actually yeah, opt in and say, Yo, I'm interested in this is great.

Mike: Cool. That's great. I I'm interested as well. I mean, one of the things I think the people who are, you know, still wedded to PDFs will say is, well, what about printing? You know, you mentioned bookmarking. But what about if somebody wants to print out some turtle content? Is that possible? Or do you lose all the benefits?

Kate: Yeah, it is possible. And, you know, it's possible to download turtle as a PDF as well. So we're not, we're not forcing people not to do that. It's definitely possible. I think, you know, there's also the idea that if you really want to kind of have a print version of your content, you could put it into a print version, and, you know, publish that and maybe have a digital version as well. I think that's totally possible. Obviously, print is still, you know, an important medium that people use and kind of want to want to, you know, reference and print out and totally get that. That being said, I think, you know, the digital world evolves so quickly and being able to update things in real time. So things don't go out of date is, you know, from a marketer's perspective, I think much more important than kind of having something that's immediate. I mean, you could print a turtle lock, I guess, why not?

Mike: It'd be crazy. But. Yeah. And then, at the other end, I mean, obviously, a lot of marketers are seeing some good results with video. So are you doing anything with video, particularly video personalization?

Kate: Yeah, video is really an interesting use case. So we partnered with a company called video card and I think some other solutions as well to embed personalised videos in personalised content. So for example, our sales and SDR team have the ability to record their video or video for a prospect or for an account, and then upload it into their personalised turtle doc and send out that whole thing. So it's got their video on the cover, and then it's got the relevant content for them contained within. So I think being able to do that, first of all, to just enable your sales team and on a one to one basis, they can send that out. But also thinking about more scale, you know, you can do you can take an account based approach and have an SDR record a video for an account and then, you know, set that up at an account level to be sent out to all the all the individuals. Yeah, I think videos is definitely a good kind of tool to use. And that kind of links back to the value of interactive content as well. I mean, being able to embed things like videos and polls and, you know, different pieces of interactivity that can be, you know, changed around and moved and engaged with adds a lot to the content as well.

Mike: That's fascinating. And it sounds like you've got, you've got quite a lot of integrations. You've talked about integration with Mark automation, you've talked about integrating with video to incorporate video. Are there any other integrations that help marketers, you know, make use of turtle more more effectively or with less investment of time?

Kate: Yeah, I mean, I think the main integrations that we're really focused on is, you know, thinking about the, the marketing tech stack, but also the sales tech stack. So I think what we're really interested in is kind of like the tech stack across the buyer journey, I would say, from the marketing teams perspective, we integrate with CRMs, we integrate with marketing automation tools. So being able to, you know, centralise all your content data in a CRM, or maybe a customer data platform, that's all possible, and then being able to deliver it via marketing automation. So you can push the data into that and, you know, be able to deliver it automatically, you know, personalization at scale through marketing automation, as well. We're also really interested in ABM platforms. So thinking about the ABM tech stack and being able to kind of, you know, gather account inside and then push that into turtle to personalise content, you know, I think there's there's quite a few integrations is is absolutely where we're headed with content automation, because in order to get your content out into the world, to get into the hands of the right people, you really do have to rely on the whole kind of biotech stack. And then I think in terms of adding like additional layers of engagement, there's like videocard, and tools like drift, which allow you to maybe embedded chatbot in it and add a different experience or engage people in a different way. That's very much conversational content. So there's different types of integrations kind of adding to the engagement of the content, but then also just thinking about the whole content production workflow and how you get it out to people simplifying, streamlining and making that much more automated.

Mike: Wow, is that there's a lot there all over the place. I love the idea of a document that has chatted bedded that's very cool. Yeah. and perhaps the most interesting thing that I think you said was you talked about market automation and CRM. So presumably, Turtle documents are basically the thing that qualifies contacts to become sales leads for a lot of your customers is that is that what you see happening? People are using engagement with the document to say, this is now sales ready?

Kate: It can be I think it has to be layered with other types of data that you have about your contact, of course. But what we do see is some interesting ways to use gates. So getting away from the kind of traditional, you fill in a content form, you're kind of engaged and you get passed over to sales, I think what we're seeing is people who are trying to find out, you know, yeah, qualify that lead a little bit further before handing it over? Or maybe maybe it's just part of the journey. You know, it really depends on the type of content and your other data, of course, but I really like some of the different uses of gates that people are doing, whether it's to add in, you know, Midway gates to say, here's some added value, do you want to sign up for a webinar on this? Do you want to sign up for a newsletter? Do you want to sign up for this ecourse we have, and that just kind of helps to nurture people along, immediately, making them more of a qualified lead, or maybe it is adding kind of a demo form or a way to get in touch with sales into your content as well, where it's relevant, I think, you know, there's different ways to think about that.

Mike: Awesome. That's, that's, that's really interesting, lots of opportunities there. So, I mean, if people are excited about this, and thinking, you know, I'd love to be able to do something I love to better create interaction. I mean, what are their alternatives? I know, I've seen some people create more interactive documents using Adobe Spark, which obviously isn't personalised, but, you know, give gives you some degree of interactivity, what would you advise people to do? If they were, they were wondering what the first step to take would be?

Kate: Well, I think in terms of creating that interactive content, you probably do need a platform of some kind to, you know, allow you to pull that all together, I think there are probably ways to do it, for instance, using your web, you know, web platform to just try out different interactive elements. For instance, if you just want to start somewhere, and for instance, try out different things, you know, different ways to embed videos and things like that in your blog, of course, you can always start there. But yeah, you know, I also think interactive content, it's an interesting, it's very broad term in some way. I mean, you could try starting with social posts, you know, put a poll around, you know, something and see what you get back and start to just engage more with your audience in different ways. And you'll start to see the value of that, I think so interactive content in terms of the what we think about with like a turtle dock, that's one way to do it, where your content, like your long form, content itself, is quite interactive, engaging all the way throughout. But as you know, if you just want to start to engage more with your audience, and learn more about them, and get them, build more of a two way conversation, start on social stir on your blog, you know, try out different ways to kind of get feedback from your audience, and get them to Yeah, comment, you know, answer a poll, watch a video, whatever it is.

Mike: That's cool. That's that that sounds like a, you know, we shouldn't stress too much about starting, we should just really start and try to be more interactive. I mean, treat them as if somebody starts and they gain traction on the poll, and people are watching more videos, and they decide they need to take the next step to, you know, to content automation platform. I mean, that, to me feels like quite a big step. And I know a lot of enterprises have had migrations to marketing automation platforms that have taken, not just months, but sometimes years. How much of a challenge? Is it to migrate across to a content automation platform? Does that have a lot of pain? Or is that something, you know, you could be producing content very quickly.

Kate: So you can produce content very quickly, we have what we had what we call our content automation maturity model, which is essentially to say that there's a journey between starting and producing your first piece of interactive content all the way down to having a really sophisticated kind of fully integrated content system that at the hub of it is this, you know, great engaging content. So there's, there's, you know, a lot of points along that journey. And I think starting where you are is super important to say like, we always kind of encourage, you know, start just start somewhere, right. So wherever you're at in terms of the level of resource and kind of complexity that you have already and want to introduce, I think that there will be kind of a meaningful starting point along that content automation maturity model. But essentially, what it might look like is, you know, at its core turtle is a better, more engaging format that allows you to really quickly produce interactive content so you can start putting more content out and you can start already getting that feedback from your audience in terms of what they're interested in the title content that you should make more of how to improve it, and you start getting data back as well. So you start learning a little bit more about your audience. And you know, you can pretty easily integrate that and connect it up to say, Okay, I've learned a little bit more about my audience now. So what do I do with that, um, so then that's kind of where personalization comes in, where you can say, well, we've got all this great data, let's structure it, let's, you know, use what we can to actually create maybe the, you know, send people the next best piece of content, or customise their journey a little bit, or start to add in elements that will particularly be interesting to them. And then, you know, getting even further, you can look to fully integrate other pieces of your tech stack, like your customer data, like your, you know, CRM and marketing automation. So, you know, it's always just this thing that kind of builds any learn along the way, you gather insight along the way. And you're able to do more advanced personalization along the way, as well. Like maybe at the beginning, you just start out by doing let's do an account base personalization campaign, where we just sort of pick a few industry segments, personalised each of those and send it out great, you know, that's a really good starting point, because you can learn a lot, you can kind of get feedback, and from there, you might make it a little bit more complex and more tailored next time. So yeah, always gonna be a journey. But you know, it's, it's great to great to get started on the journey.

Mike: I love the fact that you're, you're coming on the podcast as a vendor, and you're not saying, buy our product, and then you're done. You're actually saying, Well, you can start before you buy our product, there's things you can do. And once you buy the product, there's still this journey to go on. And still these things you can do I love that as a way to, you know, see how you can always keep getting better. That's fantastic. And I guess, you know, people listening to this, you know, will have seen turtle may have seen turtle they know that turtle, I mean, historically, I think has been very strong in the enterprise. And what about sort of midsize smaller companies? Is that something you think content automation platforms are going to service? Or is this going to really be the preserve of very large enterprises?

Kate: Yeah, I mean, we, like I said, you know, if you think about that journey, right, I think a lot of small to medium businesses can definitely benefit pretty quickly from being able to create more engaging, more interactive content. And that's definitely something we're seeing in our customer base. So we do have a kind of mid market proposition. And we've got quite a few customers who are using turtle to simply create better, more engaging content, you know, and I think that's, honestly, you know, that that can be a great and in some customers who really, that's kind of their bread and butter, and that's, that's what really works for them. And that might be, you know, where their content automation journey stops for now, you know, let's see. And then we've got other kind of customers coming in. And actually, they do have quite a bit of data and quite a bit of, you know, aspiration to personalise, and there's this real interest in it. So I think there's a segment of businesses who are really, really interested in doing more with that. So, yeah, there's there's absolutely a lot of different ways to engage with turtle, but depending on where you're at, in the size of business, you know, might depend where you're at on that journey.

Mike: Awesome. That's amazing. So I mean, we're running out of time, I'm really intrigued to know you've given us some really great advice. But you know, do you have like three top tips for people who are looking to make their content better?

Kate: Three top tips. Okay. So I think the first one would be user data. I know data is something that we all talk about. And I think we tend to try and use it, but I'm not I don't know, I have a feeling that content in particular is it is an arena where we could think more about the data on what what people are interested in, and what we should kind of serve them up next, using all this great data that we have as marketers, I think the second one would be turning your content into a conversation, you know, thinking about interactivity, and maybe the very beginning of that is just how can you open it up and make it something that, you know, instead of you're broadcasting content at people, it's like, you're sort of asking for feedback in various ways, whether that's just collecting information about how they engage with it, or whether that's directly asking a poll or, you know, maybe maybe a personalization for power advance, I guess, but just thinking about different ways where you can start to turn it into something where you're getting feedback and giving people the chance to feed into what you're doing as well, because ultimately, our audience kind of knows best what they want to see and read about and hear. And I think there's a lot of ways that we can think about turning content into a conversation. And I guess a final point would be if we go back to this idea of lead gen and what the value of content is, I always prioritise quality and saying that content at its core should be really engaging. So I don't really hold with the idea that we can get away with just sort of, we got their email and we'll call it a day I really think that, you know, we really need to think about what is the value behind the content that we're putting out there? Is it resonating? Is it really working? Is it getting people? Like, is it doing what we want? Is it getting people like very interested or motivated or inspired or whatever it is? And I think there's a little bit of interrogation that we can do there.

Mike: That's brilliant. So, I mean, data interaction and quality are the three things. I think that's a great message. Thank you so much for the advice and the tips. Is there anything else you feel we should have covered? Or we've missed during our conversation?

Kate: No, I mean, I think I think it was a really interesting conversation. Thanks so much, Mike. Again, yeah. Thanks for having me on the podcast. I think we talked through quite a few different interesting topics. So always happy to dive in further with anyone who is interested.

Mike: That'd be amazing. I mean, if somebody did want to come to educate, what would be the best way for them to go about that?

Kate: Yeah, I think LinkedIn is the best way. If you search for Kate Terry Turtle to you, RTL, you will probably find me. But that's definitely where I'm most active socially. And we'd be happy to have a chat and yeah, speak further about it.

Mike: Well, thanks so much for all your time and insight. It's been fascinating. Thanks for being on the podcast. Kate. Thanks so much for listening to marketing b2b Tech. We hope you enjoyed the episode. And if you did, please make sure you subscribe on iTunes, or on your favourite podcast application. If you'd like to know more, please visit our website at Napier b2b dot com or contact me directly on LinkedIn.

DFA Manufacturing Media Launches New Online Portal

DFA Manufacturing Media has launched a new online portal and social media information resource, under the brand Smart Futures. 

With current publishing titles such as Drives & Controls, Plant & Works Engineering and Hydraulics and Pneumatics, DFA Manufacturing Media has launched Smart Futures to provide readers with an opportunity to learn and stay up to date about smart technologies across all sectors.

Offering an immersive and interactive experience, Smart Futures aims to support the ongoing digital transformation currently being seen across the UK and globally, for a wide spectrum of sectors, including manufacturing, medical, building, agriculture, energy, security, transport and materials.

The online portal will explore emerging best practices and will focus on being an information resource centre with the aim to provide readers with insights on a range of digitalisation topics.

Here at Napier, we are always happy to see a launch of a new publication.  It's clear to see that there is an ongoing shift as more publications invest in digital alternatives, and it's great to see DFA Media Manufacturing launching Smart Futures to address this digital change.

BEEAs Entry Deadline Extended

The British Engineering Excellence Awards (BEEAs) has announced an extension of its entry deadline, with entries to be submitted by midnight on Friday 3rd December 2021. 

The BEEAs celebrate the most innovative design engineers in the UK, and this year there is a total of 12 awards up for grabs.

Entries are assessed by an independent panel of judges drawn from a cross-section of electronic and engineering design disciplines, and the awards ceremony will take place on the 18th March 2022 at the Landmark Hotel in London.

To submit an entry, register here and complete the online submission process. Good luck to everyone entering! 

Napier Named as 'The Most Outstanding PR Agency' at The Electronics Industry Awards 2021

Some members of the Napier team at the EIA ceremony.

We are delighted to share that Napier was named as the winner of ‘The Most Outstanding PR Agency’ category at the Electronics Industry Awards for the second year running.

Announced at the awards ceremony at the Tower Hotel in London on Thursday 21st October 2021, we feel privileged to have been recognized by the industry and to have had the opportunity to celebrate with our peers in person.

Mike Maynard, Managing Director at Napier, commented on Napier’s success: “We are thrilled to be named as the ‘The Most Outstanding PR Agency’ at The Electronics Industry Awards for the second year running. I'm am extremely proud of our amazing team and grateful to our wonderful clients".

Congratulations also to Microchip Technology, Fluke Corporation and Tektronix who were all recognised for their achievements at this year's awards ceremony.

A Sad Goodbye to Gloria Langham

gloria langhamWe were sad to hear the news about the passing of Gloria Langham. Having spent most of her career working in advertising, Gloria was well-known in the electronics industry and will be missed by many.

Born in the UK, Gloria moved to the US, and was well-known to many in the electronics industry with her role as Media Director at Media and More. A lovely obituary is available online.

Our thoughts are with Gloria's family and friends at this difficult time.

Drives & Controls 2022 Announces Return of Robotic Demonstration Area

Back in October 2020, we reported on the postponement of the biennial co-located events, the Drives & Controls Exhibition, Fluid Power & SystemsAir-Tech, Plant & Asset Management and Smart Industry Expo.

Postponed due to the uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic, we were delighted to hear of a successful return for the in-person Drives & Controls exhibition, with nearly all exhibition stands sold out.

With over 13,500 visitors expected, the event showcases the best of British manufacturing and engineering, bringing together the industry to cover critical areas such as energy efficiency, machine safety, drives, motion control, and robotics and automation.

2022 will also see the return of a live 'Robotic Demonstration Area', which highlights the fast-growing sector of robotic technology across the industrial landscape. The event will also feature a full conference programme, and EPDTDA and Gambica Pavilions which will focus on automation and the trends affecting manufacturing.

It's great to hear that so many members of the industry will be getting involved in the Drives & Controls Exhibition. With the COVID-19 pandemic putting a hold on live events until now, we look forward to seeing what we are sure will be an outstanding exhibition in 2022.

Growing B2B Agency Napier Welcomes Two New Hires

Napier, a leading B2B PR and Marketing agency has welcomed two new members to its growing team.

Elana Bryan joins the team as a Client Services Manager with over five years of marketing experience working both in an agency and client-side. Elana has overseen national and international campaigns within the B2B sector, and her expertise lies in using marketing and creativity to deliver tangible results for her clients.

Napier has also welcomed Natasha Websdale as Marketing Specialist. Since graduating with a degree in media production, Natasha has focused her attention towards building a career in digital marketing. She brings marketing and programming expertise to support the Napier team in delivering successful digital campaigns for our clients.

“It’s great to be able to add these two amazing people to the Napier team,” commented Mike Maynard, managing director of Napier. “Their experience and expertise will be an asset to our clients. In particular I’m excited about Elana’s experience of managing creative projects, and Natasha’s front-end development skills.”

Napier is delighted to welcome both Elana and Natasha to the team and we look forward to them settling into their respective roles.

Elektronik Journal to Become Part of Elektronik Industrie

Elektronik Journal will cease publishing at the end of the year, as it is absorbed into its sister magazine elektronik industrie which sits under the umbrella of the online portal all-electronics.

elektronik industrie will feature new specials in 2022 covering topics normally featured by the Elektronik Journal.

It will be interesting to see the changes elektronik industrie make as Elektronik Journal ceases publishing, and we look forward to seeing the revised magazine in 2022.


Why Napier is Exploring the World of TikTok

Yes, you read that title right, Napier is trying out TikTok. Are we nuts?

Not quite.

Napier has a reputation of delivering results, not jumping on the latest trends and TikTok dances, so why is it worth our time?

Well, with 42% of TikTok users aged 30 and above, the mainstream view of TikTok being only for teenagers, and wacky dances isn’t quite correct. Although there’s no denying that this is a significant part of the platform, there is a world of B2B, albeit quite small, which is beginning to grow a presence within TikTok.

With a quick glance through the platform focusing on search terms such as 'marketing', you can see some key business players already making an impact.

Gary Vaynerchuck is a prime example. With 9 million followers, Gary’s content ranges from providing tips and insights into how to run a business to repurposing content from podcast interviews that provide an ‘insider’ view into the decisions and culture at Vaynermedia. Using a mixture of useful, informative videos as well personal content which links to trending hashtags, Gary walks the line between business and TikTok ‘fun’ to achieve credibility and views on the platform.

Grant Cardone is another good example. Although only featuring 1.2 million followers on TikTok (significantly less than Vaynerchuck), Gary has found a format that results in 600K views plus on the majority of his videos. His approach although similar to Vaynerchuck in terms of reusing podcast interviews for content differs in the way each video answers a specific question highlighted clearly in a branded subtitle box in both the thumbnail and beginning of the video.

As for B2B companies, Tiktok offers the opportunity for marketing teams to be bold, clever and even a little bit weird with content strategies. Sage was a prime example of this, running the UK’s first B2B campaign on TikTok, inviting TikTok’s SMB community to share videos on how they were ‘bossing it’ in 2020.  Making full use of TikTok’s advertising forms to maximise impact, including a branded hashtag challenge, and a premium TopView placement, the campaign received 8.2 billion views and one million entries into the challenge.

B2B agencies are already making the move to the platform too, with Leadit marketing a good example as a company that is achieving between 200-600 views per post with only 86 followers. Content includes helpful tips and tricks on different areas of B2B technology marketing and focuses on key topics such as sales and marketing alignment, as well as integrated campaigns and content marketing.

So, although there are some B2B brands on TikTok making an impact, the truth is that creating B2B content on TikTok is mostly uncharted territory. There’s no guarantee that TikTok will be super successful for B2B, or that it will become more mainstream, and are we a little bit crazy for giving it a go? Probably. But TikTok does allow B2B companies the opportunity to share content in a unique format, and who knows perhaps it will be a trustworthy platform in the future to reach key personas. Only time will tell…

New Website for Power Electronics Industry Launched

everything PE is a new website that has been launched to address the power electronics industry. Developed by the creators of everything RF, the new everything PE website sits within the network of publications such as the PCB Directory, the EMC Directory and GoPhotonics. 

Developed to meet the growing demands of the power electronics industry, everything PE will aim to help solve the problems that engineers are facing, and will provide updates via the latest news, products, whitepapers and upcoming events in the industry. All content will be tagged with relevant keywords to make it easier and simpler to search on the website.

everything PE also features a parametric search tool, enabling engineers to find products from leading manufacturers in each category based on their requirements. Currently, the search tool features 15 categories, which allows users to see detailed product specifications, download datasheets, compare products and get pricing or request a quotation. The products are sorted by relevance and launch date allowing users to view the latest and the most up-to-date products that meet the requirements, and any inquiries generated via everything PE are directly routed to the sales contact at the relevant company and their distributors.

At Napier, we are always pleased when a new website is launched to address growth within the industry, and we look forward to seeing the content the new site will provide.

To find out more about the new everything PE site, please click here. 

Editorial Changes and Updates from UK Electronic Publications

It's been a busy month of editorial changes across the UK Electronic publications, and we have several key updates to share.

Electronic Specifier Updates

Joe Bush has announced that he will be moving on from Electronic Specifier, with his last day taking place on the 30th of September 2021. Joe has been Managing Editor at Electronics Specifier for over five years and will be taking over as editor of The Manufacturer Magazine. 

Electronic Specifier has also welcomed three new members to its editorial team. Sam Holland joins the publication as Editor, whilst Kiera Sowery joins with a focus on expanding Electronic Specifier's targeted site, www.student-circuit.com. She will focus on developing content by connecting with students from universities globally and working with them to create a portal for projects.

Beatrice O’Flaherty has also joined the Electronic Specifier fold and will support existing editors in keeping the website up-to-date to support electronics engineers throughout their design processes, by increasing the volume of industry-relevant content.

Electronic Specifier has also announced a roadshow, as they plan to visit the top Electronics Engineering UK Universities. Over the next few weeks, the Electronic Specifier team will be visiting 10 universities starting with Glasgow and Strathclyde, followed by Sheffield, Nottingham, Liverpool and Surrey, closing with Southampton, UCL, Imperial and Brunel. They will be inviting new and existing students of all relevant electronics courses to receive the Student Circuit newsletter, as well as running a competition to win a drone.

Movement at Datateam

Niamh Marriott, previously an Editor at Datateam's Electrical Engineering, Converter and Components in Electronics publications, has also made a recent move, leaving her role at Datateam to take on the role as Deputy Editor at KHL Group.

Success for Industry Tech Days 2021

Industry Tech Days 2021 recently took place between the 13th and 17th September, and the virtual conference has been declared a huge success, with the events team revealing some impressive figures.

The five-day free digital conference and trade show hosted on the All About Circuits website received a total of 40,122 attendees, a 60% increase from 2020. The event hosted 50 live sessions, five keynote forums, and provided 245 pieces of technical content, with a total of 3,300 hours watched during the keynote and exhibitor live sessions.

Industry Tech Days certainly achieved a global presence with 210 countries represented by the attendees, and figures showing a high level of engagement throughout the virtual conference.  A total of 650 questions were asked by attendees, and a staggeringly low 2.58% bounce rate was achieved; a significant result with the average bounce rate on industry media sites sitting in the 60%-75% range.

With 97% of Industry Tech Days attendees confirming they would participate in the event again in 2022, EETech continues to prove that virtual events can be a huge success. These results definitely show that Industry Tech Days are doing something right, and it would certainly be interesting to be able to dig deeper to understand the ROI for exhibitors.

Industry Tech Days 2022 has already been confirmed and will be taking place from Monday 19th to Friday 23rd September.

Global Industry Focus Magazine Announces First Issue

In May 2021, we reported on the launch of a new digital magazine, Global Industry Focus, launched by the same team behind What's New in Electronics (WNIE) online. So we were delighted to hear the news that the first issue of the new publication will be live at the end of September 2021.

As a bi-monthly publication, the magazine will explore new ways of connecting with its audience and readers, by evolving static editorial content and presenting it in a more engaging way. The publication will be a fully optimised digital magazine offering readers an in-depth look at companies, their people, and their unique journeys across the whole electronics sector. The magazine will be printed only for major trade shows to save on paper and postage.

Featuring guest editors from across the electronics world, Global Industry Focus will provide regular updates from industry associations and trade bodies, via news, technical articles and opinion pieces.

Kirsty Hazlewood, WNIE content creator and Global Industry Focus editor commented: "Global Industry Focus is a new digital magazine that will offer a functional and immersive editorial experience for our audience. We’re looking forward to bringing our readers extensive coverage of the whole electronics and off-board industries using a new immersive and enhanced approach.”

We look forward to seeing the first issue of Global Industry Focus, and the direction the editorial team has taken.





Electronic Component Show Going Ahead in May 2022

Back in April 2021, we reported that the Electronic Component Show (ECS) which had originally been meant to take place in 2020, had been postponed due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. So, we were delighted to hear the news from MMG Publishing that the ECS will be going ahead in 2022, taking place on Thursday 19th May at the Kassam stadium home of Oxford United football club.

Mark Leary, MMG’s publisher & founder said ”The interest for a one-day tabletop exhibition and educational seminar presentations is very positive from visitors and exhibitors alike. We have been searching for the ideal venue and location for the show and the Kassam stadium ticks all of the boxes for everyone. The exhibition area is spaced out more than usual with a 1-metre space between tabletop stands, and with a one-way system and more internal space, this will provide a safe environment for all.  The seminar programme will consist of educational presentations for design engineers and purchasing professionals and 55% of the exhibition tabletop’s have already been sold from exhibitors who originally booked into the 2020 event".

The show will be open from 10am-3pm, and visitor numbers will be restricted to provide design engineers and purchasing professionals the opportunity to network with electronics manufacturers, distributors and service providers in a safe environment.

The return of exhibitions and trade events were inevitable, and it's great to see shows such as ECS moving forward, and providing professionals and exhibitors with the opportunity to return to a 'face to face' format safely.

The Engineering Network Ltd Acquires Industrial Technology Magazine

Industrial Technology, the design engineering magazine has been sold by its previous owner George Bennett to the engineering publisher The Engineering Network Ltd (TEN).

Effective since 1st September 2021, Industrial Technology and its associated website join brands such as MachineBuilding.net and Fastening&Bonding.net under the leadership of TEN's Managing Director Luke Webster and publisher Mark Newby.

The acquisition sees engineering design veterans in the shape of Luke and Mark adding valuable experience and expertise to a team that includes Industrial Technology Magazine's widely respected and experienced editor Mark Simms. Commenting on the change of ownership, Simms said "The timing is perfect, and the new, expanded team likewise. I am delighted to be entering a welcome period of resurgence for a superb journal that I have helped build for more than 20 years!”

Luke added “Few would argue that Mark Simms is recognised as being amongst the very best Editors in the engineering design press and we’re so pleased to be working with him on Industrial Technology. We are also delighted to say that Industrial Technology sales stalwarts Mark West, David Harman, Jan Anderson and Steve Brotherton are also part of our team. Coupled with our experienced circulation management team headed by Andy Kirk and our Creative Director John Fisher we’re looking forward to taking an already excellent magazine and website to a new level.”

With hints of plans that are already in motion to enhance the Industrial Technology brand by developing the magazine, website and newsletter as well as refreshing the circulation, this is certainly an exciting move from TEN as they continue to build a portfolio of leading brands in the engineering sector. We look forward to seeing the direction Industrial Technology will take moving forward.


BEEAs Still Open for Entries

The British Engineering Excellence Awards (BEEAs) is still open for entries, with a deadline of Friday 5th November 2021. 

Produced in association with Eureka! and New Electronics magazines, the BEEAs features eight new categories for this year's awards, including design project of the year, digital innovation of the year, and engineered product of the year.

With a total of 12 categories, entries will be assessed by an independent panel of judges drawn from a cross-section of electronic and engineering design disciplines; and the awards ceremony will be taking place on the 18th March 2022 at the Landmark Hotel in London.

It's great to see the changes in the engineering landscape being reflected in the new and updated categories at the BEEAs, and we look forward to celebrating some of the most innovative design engineers in the UK next year.

To submit an entry, register here and complete the online submission process.

Webinar Best Practices: 5 Things We Learnt From ON24's Webinar Series

It's no secret that the use of webinars has accelerated in the past year, as many businesses had to adapt to a new virtual approach, in order to communicate with potential customers.

With nearly 70% of B2B buyers preferring to research online on their own, and an expected 80% of B2B sales interactions between suppliers and buyers to occur through digital channels by 2025, it's never been more important to ensure your digital tactics and communications such as webinars, are optimised for success.

We recently attended a webinar by ON24, the digital experience platform, which delved into the results of a recent study they had undertaken to understand the best practices and current benchmarks for hosting webinars. Analysing 100,482 webinars held by companies between January-December 2020 across Europe and the US, the study aimed to discover webinar best practices and benchmarks for success.

In this blog, I'll explore the top five things we learnt from the webinar and best practices to consider in the future.

A Webinar is an Experience

With the capabilities of digital platforms continually expanding, companies now have the option to provide more than just a traditional PowerPoint webinar. Webinars can be anything we make of them, and although the primary focus is to generate leads, it can offer many more additional opportunities.

Over the last year, webinars have become more approachable, with content that is interactive and provides a multi-touch experience. Webinars are no longer a tactic that can just be used for top of the funnel activities. Instead, they now have the capabilities to provide your potential customers with a positive experience throughout each stage of the sales funnel. They can be used as a top of the funnel tactic, but also as a bottom of the funnel tactic, by providing content such as product demos.

Long Term Promotion isn't as Important as it Seems

ON24's study revealed that there is a change in the notice needed to attend a webinar. Instead of long term promotion, it seems there is the immediacy of 'now', with 45% of companies finding that when promotion takes place 1-7 days before the event, they achieved more registrations, compared to the 20% of companies that promoted more than 15 days before the webinar, resulting in fewer registration sign-ups.

As a 12% increase from 2019, this was an interesting finding, offering companies the option to be more flexible with the promotion plans they put in place, and in fact, suggesting the tactic to do a 'big push' of promotion closer to the date of the webinar.

Tuesday and Wednesdays were revealed to be the best days to send promotional emails, sitting at 22% and 21% respectively, followed closely by Thursday at 20% and surprisingly Monday, with 18% of companies voting for this as the best day.

There's Flexibility to the 'Right' Day to Hold a Webinar

The study revealed some interesting results for when best to hold a webinar. Although Wednesday and Thursday were revealed to be the clear winners of when to host webinars, there was also a surprising increase in people wanting to watch webinars on Monday and Friday. This can almost directly be related to the shift of working from home we've all undergone the last year, especially Friday, which previously never would have been a feasible option.

Reassuringly attention spans for webinars have also increased since last year, with 57 minutes being the average viewing time in 2020.

Steady Increase of Engagement Tools and Videos

With the expectation for a webinar to be engaging and interactive, it was not surprising to see that there has been a steady increase in the use of engagement tools and videos. 86% of companies used Q&A throughout their webinar, (remember to encourage engagement you can do Q&A in the middle and end) with 70% uploading resources within the platform for listeners to download while watching the webinar.

There are several opportunities for customers to use engagement tools to their advantage. 43% of companies used surveys to generate content for their presentation, whilst only 22% used polling as a tactic to integrate their audience and start conversations throughout the webinar.

Several companies also missed the trick to include links to their socials within the webinars, with only 22% ensuring they did this. Unsurprisingly, video has become a key tactic, with 66% of all webinars in 2020 featuring some type of video.

On-Demand is the Future

Although encouraging registrations for a 'live' webinar is extremely important, it's also vital that an on-demand version is made available.

The study revealed that an average of 53% of registrations watched the webinars live, with 43% of registrations watching the same webinars on-demand. The stats show that the gap between live and on-demand is close, proving that your content can still be significantly valuable once the live webinar is over.

On-demand webinars can be used to link to similar content by personas type or industry, or to create snackable content that can be used on social media channels. Surprisingly a low 29% of respondents shared that they integrate their webinars into personalized landing pages, while only 43% are currently using on-demand webinar hubs to promote webinars after the live event is over.


With 89% of respondents believing that webinars outperform other channels in creating qualified leads, and 66% of respondents sayings their sales teams prioritise leads that come from webinars, it's clear to see the impact webinars can have on the sales funnel. In fact, 72% of respondents said that webinars directly impacted their revenue and pipeline!

At Napier, we run our own webinar series, and we've taken note of where we can improve to ensure we are optimizing our webinars for success. If you have any questions regarding tactics you can implement to make your own webinars successful, why not get in touch with us? We have extensive experience in helping our clients generate high-quality leads via webinars.

Power Systems Design Launches New TechTalk Area

Power Systems Design has launched a new area on its website named TechTalk. The new section provides readers with a range of content focusing on how new technologies and applications are making a difference across the power industry.

Hosted on the website as a department, the content will also be shared in Power Systems Design's weekly newsletters.

Here at Napier, we are always delighted to receive news of publications expanding their content and focus. With the new department live, there are already several informative articles available on the site.

To find out more about the new TechTalk department, please click here.